Fraction Review

Mathematics 1: Fraction Review

I find that across many areas of mathematics, students do not have a very robust understanding of the underlying principles of manipulating fractions. I aim to rectify that here.

1. Re-introduction to the Behavior of Fractions

First and foremost, it is important to recognize that fractions are no different from a division problem. The fraction $\frac{1}{2}$ is exactly the same thing as $1\div2$. Sometimes we might want the numerical result of this division operation, such as $\frac{1}{2}=0.5$, but sometimes fractions are not so contractible in numeric form, and so it is ultimate better to just leave a number in “fraction form”, such as $\frac{3}{7}$, which is unquestionably a better notation than 0.428571… .

In elementary school, you might have spent a long time learning to convert fractions into “improper fractions”. While this is a useful skill in activities like baking, in mathematics, we will likely never want or need to consider the “improper” form of a fraction. Thus, henceforth no longer worry about converting a fraction in the form $\frac{a}{b}$ where $a\geq{b}$ into some form like $C\ \frac{d}{b}$ where $d\leq{b}$ and $C\geq{1}$ with $C\in \mathbb{Z}$. Let’s keep things proper!

Before we begin adding and subtracting fractions, let’s consider the anatomy of a fraction:

As you can see, the fraction merely communicates the number of parts of a whole quantitty we have (the numerator), with the “whole” having been divided into some specified number of equal sub-units (the denominator). In the case above, I have divided a whole into 57 equal parts and am taking 20 of those euqla divisions. Imagine a large pizza that I have divided into 57 equally sized pieces and then taking 20 of those pieces onto your plate; about how much of the pizza are you eating?

a circle cut into 57 equal pieces with 20 pieces highlighted

Looks to be about a third of the pizza! Being able to approximate the value of fraction can be a useful skill to develop. For example, the number $\frac{20}{57}$ is quite opaque as a decimal, but with some experience and fluency in working with fraction one might recognize that dividing a pizza into 57 pieces is close to dividing a pizza into 60 pieces (i.e. the size of the pizza slices won’t differ great from one pizza to the other, and so we can fiairly say that 20 pieces of a pizza divided into 57 pieces is close to the same amount of pizza in a pie divided into 60 equal pieces with 20 taken away).

More specifically, $\frac{20}{57}\approx\frac{20}{60}$, and, if you remember your methods of fraction simplification, we know that

$$\frac{20}{60}=\frac{1(20)}{3(20)}=\frac{1}{3}(\frac{20}{20})=\frac{1}{3}(1)=\frac{1}{3}$$

A circle cut into 60 equal pieces with 20 pieces highlighted. Notice how this circle looks
nearly the same as the circle above cut into 57 equal pieces with 20 highlighted.
A circle cut into 3 equal pieces with 1 piece highlighted. Notice how this circle has exactly the same amount of space highlighted as the circle next to it with 60 equal pieces and 20 highlighted.

$$\frac{20}{57}\approx\frac{20}{60}=\frac{1}{3}$$

If that was a bit much, don’t worry! We will discuss fraction simplification and multiplication momentarily.

2. Addition/Subtraction of Fractions and Common Denominators

To add or subtract fractions, we need to make them the “same kind” of fraction. We cannot just add/subtraction different kinds of fractions willy-nilly. This is similar to something like adding apples and oranges together and claiming that you have more apples as a result of adding some oranges to your pile of apples:

$$5\text{ apples}+3\text{ oranges}\neq8\text{ apples}$$

Similarly,

$$5\text{ apples}+3\text{ oranges}\neq8\text{ oranges}$$

However, if we can classify apples and oranges as some other thing, let’s say “fruits” we can conceptually add them together into the same pile of things.

$$5\text{ apple fruits}+3\text{ orange fruits}=8\text{ fruits}$$

Here, we found the common thing that relates apples or oranges: their aspect as fruits. When we add fractions, we have to find their “common denominator” (that number that will make them the same kind of object). Think of the denominator as that number which determined the “variety” of fraction we are dealing with (i.e. the kind of fruit in our fruit example). The numerator is how many of those kinds of fractions I have piled up together.

$$\frac{5}{\text{ apples}}+\frac{3}{\text{ oranges}}= ?$$

To add these fractions together, we need to find some aspect that apples and oranges share in common (i.e. a “common denominator”)

$$\frac{5\text{ fruits}}{\text{ apple fruits}}+\frac{3\text{ fruits}}{\text{ orange fruits}}=\frac{8\text{ fruits}}{\text{ fruits}}$$

This is a somewhat silly example, but it helps to explain why we cannot add different varieties of fractions together. Furthermore, you will notice that the denominator played no part in the ultimate addition/subtraction operation; that is, I did not add the denominators together in the fruit example: this is because they are not numbers but are rather the indicator of the type of fraction I am dealing with.

So, though in fraction addition/subtraction the denominator will be a number, don’t think of it quite like a normal number; it’s an identification of type.


How to find Common Denominators:

So, let’s consider an actual fraction addition problem:

$$\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}=?$$

Well, these are not the same type of fraction: the first fraction is of the “half” variety while the second is of the “third” variety. So, we need to find a number that 2 and 3 share in common and adjust each fraction to be of that variety.

The most reliable and fast way of determining a common denominator is to multiply the two denominators together; this will tell you at least one possible denominator they share in common:

$$2(3)=6$$

Thus, if we can make each of these fractions of the “sixth” variety, we can add them together and sort them in the “sixth” pile.

Keep in mind that when we change the denominator, we have to change the numerator in the same way to keep the fraction fundamentally the same. Thinking back to our fruit example, I did not change the fact that each fraction was of apples and oranges; I merely appended “fruits” to the top and the bottom of the fraction, recognizing an aspect they share in common.

$$\frac{5\text{fruits}}{\text{apple fruits}}+\frac{3\text{fruits}}{\text{orange fruits}}=\frac{8\text{fruits}{\text{fruits}}$$

I could always remove the “fruits” label and return easily to what I had before if I needed to go backwards. I have not changed the fundamental nature of the objects (i.e. apples and oranges).

So, if I want to change my “halves” (i.e. $\frac{a}{2}$ fractions with $a$ just being how many halves we have) into “sixths” (i.e $\frac{b}{6}$ fractions with $b$ just being how many sixths we have as a result of this transformation), I need to multiply 2 in the denominator by 3; consequently, I also need to multiply the numerator by 3, just like I had to put “fruits” in the top and bottom of my fruit fractions.

$$\frac{1(3)}{2(3)}+\frac{1}{3}=?$$

Similarly, if I want to change my “thirds” (i.e. $\frac{c}{3}$ fractions with $c$ just being how many thirds we have) into “sixths” (i.e $\frac{b}{6}$ fractions with $b$ just being how many sixths we have as a result of this transformation), I need to multiply 3 in the denominator by 2; consequently, I also need to multiply the numerator by 2, just like I had to put “fruits” in the top and bottom of my fruit fractions.

$$\frac{1(3)}{2(3)}+\frac{1(2)}{3(2)}=\frac{3}{6}+\frac{2}{6}$$

Notice that if I wanted to simplify my new fractions, I would return to my original fractions, since these “sixth” fractions are fundamentally the same as the originals, although now seen as a common type (i.e. sixths).

$$\frac{3}{6}\rightarrow\frac{1}{2}$$

$$\frac{2}{6}\rightarrow\frac{1}{3}$$

Now, I can add these fractions together, since they are the same type of fraction:

$$\frac{3}{6}+\frac{2}{6}=\frac{5}{6}$$


Simplify $\frac{2}{9} + \frac{4}{21}$.

$\frac{2}{9}+\frac{4}{21}=\frac{2\cdot 21+4\cdot 9}{9 \cdot 21} = \frac{78}{189} =\frac{3\cdot26}{3\cdot63}=\frac{26}{63}$

Simplify $\frac{5}{6}+\frac{14}{15}$.

$\frac{5}{6}+\frac{14}{15}=\frac{5\cdot15+14\cdot6}{6\cdot15}=\frac{159}{90}=\frac{3\cdot53}{3\cdot30}=\frac{53}{30}$

3. Comparing Fractions: Common Denominators and Lowest Terms

Fractions are, on the whole, more tractable than decimals. Decimals have become ascendant in areas like engineering and science for the sake of easy reporting of data and uncertainty in that data. Fractions are rations of integers written $\frac{a}{b}$ where $a$ and $b$ are (potentially negative) whole numbers and $b \neq 0$ . They are a natural extension of the whole numbers because they allow us to indicate pieces or parts of a whole.

The primary difficulty with fractions for many people begins with reckoning quantity. Which is large $\frac{4}{7}$ or $\frac{5}{8}$? You have to attend to both the numerator (the top portion of the fraction) and the denominator (the bottom portion of the fraction) in order to determine this. Here, the easiest way to compare is find a common denominator- a skill that is generally essential for dealing with fractions. The simplest method to find a common denominator is to use the least common multiple of the denominators; in this case $7 \cdot 8 = 56$. Now, we can rewrite this comparison as

$$\begin{align*} \frac{4}{7} &\stackrel{?}{=} \frac{5}{8} \rightarrow \\ \\ \left(\frac{4}{7}\right)\left(\frac{8}{8}\right) &\stackrel{?}{=} \left(\frac{5}{8}\right)\cdot\left(\frac{7}{7}\right) \rightarrow \\ \\ \frac{32}{56} &< \frac{35}{56} \end{align*}$$

The symbol denoted $\stackrel{?}{=}$ tells we do not currently know the relationship. The second step here may seem daunting, but this is one of the most common tricks in mathematics: we multiply by 1 in the correct form. This leaves the underlying value of the expression unchanged, but helps us to put in a more useful comparative format.

We need to explore another trick before we go further. Fractions are not unique representations of a number. For instance, $\frac{25}{35} = \left(\frac{5}{7}\right)\cdot\left(\frac{5}{5}\right) =\frac{5}{7}$. This suggests that we can apply the fundamental theorem of arithmetic (there is a unique factorization of an integer) to the numerator and the denominator and then cancel common factors that appear in both. This implies that there is a unique fractional representation of a number in lowest terms! It is considered good practice to examine our result at the end of a calculation and put it into lowest terms.

What is $\frac{30}{250}$ in lowest terms?

$$ \frac{30}{250} = \frac{3\cdot 10}{25 \cdot 10} = \frac{3}{25}$$

What is $\frac{14}{70}$ in lowest terms?

$$ \frac{14}{70} = \frac{2 \cdot 7}{2 \cdot 5 \cdot 7} = \frac{1}{5}$$

4. Multiplying fractions

Multiplying fractions is very straight forward and offers many advantages over multiplying decimals. If I ask a student to multiply $.33333… \cdot .8$ this is often very challenging. To multiply fractions, you need only multiply all the numerators together to obtain the new numerator and then multiply all the denominators together to get the new denominator. Here, we know that $.33333…$ is better represented as $\frac{1}{3}$ and similarly, we can ascertain that $.8 = \frac{4}{5}$. Here, we then have

$$\frac{1}{3} \cdot \frac{4}{5} = \frac{1 \cdot 4}{3 \cdot 5} = \frac{4}{15}$$

Simplify $\frac{2}{9} \cdot \frac{4}{21}$.

$\frac{2}{9}\cdot \frac{4}{21}= \frac{2 \cdot 4}{9 \cdot 21}= \frac{8}{189}$

Simplify $\frac{5}{6} \cdot \frac{14}{15}$.

$\frac{5}{6} \cdot \frac{14}{15}= \frac{5\cdot14}{6\cdot15} = \frac{2\cdot5\cdot7}{2\cdot3^2\cdot5}=\frac{7}{9}$

5. Reciprocals and division of fractions

The reciprocal of a fraction is sometimes called the multiplicative inverse. If I write a number as $\frac{a}{b}$ then its reciprocal will be $\frac{b}{a}$. The product of a fraction and it’s reciprocal is always one. An equivalent way to define division is multiplication by the reciprocal. Let’s examine why this is potentially useful.

$$\frac{\frac{5}{7}}{\frac{3}{5}} = \frac{5}{7} \cdot \frac{5}{3} = \frac{5 \cdot 5}{7 \cdot 3} = \frac{25}{21}$$